What is the most reliable mitigation for CSRF on state-changing requests?

Problem Statement

Explanation

CSRF protection should not rely on headers that can be absent or altered. Combine server-verified anti-CSRF tokens with SameSite cookies and check content type and origin on risky endpoints. These checks are detailed across WSTG and related OWASP guidance on input and session management.

Code Solution

SolutionRead Only

POST /transfer
X-CSRF-Token: e3f...
Cookie: sid=...; SameSite=Strict

Practice Sets

This question appears in the following practice sets:

Web App: OWASP Core

Next Question

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime

What is the most reliable mitigation for CSRF on state-changing requests?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Why is a written scope and Rules of Engagement mandatory before any ethical hacking test?

Which ordering matches the common PTES workflow?

In ethical hacking, what does “without authorization” generally imply for legality?

What is the purpose of a Safe Harbor clause in a vulnerability disclosure or bounty program?

Which activity is typically out of scope for standard penetration tests unless explicitly allowed?

More from Ethical hacking

Master Interviews Anywhere, Anytime

What is the most reliable mitigation for CSRF on state-changing requests?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Why is a written scope and Rules of Engagement mandatory before any ethical hacking test?

Which ordering matches the common PTES workflow?

In ethical hacking, what does “without authorization” generally imply for legality?

What is the purpose of a Safe Harbor clause in a vulnerability disclosure or bounty program?

Which activity is typically out of scope for standard penetration tests unless explicitly allowed?

More from Ethical hacking

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime