In ethical hacking, what does “without authorization” generally imply for legality?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Ethical testing must have explicit permission from the owner. Acting without authorization, or exceeding granted permissions, risks criminal or civil penalties even if intentions are good.

Code Solution

SolutionRead Only

permit: signed_letter(id=ENG-2025-0142, owner=ExampleCorp, assets=list)

Practice Sets

This question appears in the following practice sets:

Ethics & Method

Next Question

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime

In ethical hacking, what does “without authorization” generally imply for legality?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Why is a written scope and Rules of Engagement mandatory before any ethical hacking test?

Which ordering matches the common PTES workflow?

What is the purpose of a Safe Harbor clause in a vulnerability disclosure or bounty program?

Which activity is typically out of scope for standard penetration tests unless explicitly allowed?

Before running a phishing simulation, what ethical requirement must be met?

More from Ethical hacking

Master Interviews Anywhere, Anytime

In ethical hacking, what does “without authorization” generally imply for legality?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Why is a written scope and Rules of Engagement mandatory before any ethical hacking test?

Which ordering matches the common PTES workflow?

What is the purpose of a Safe Harbor clause in a vulnerability disclosure or bounty program?

Which activity is typically out of scope for standard penetration tests unless explicitly allowed?

Before running a phishing simulation, what ethical requirement must be met?

More from Ethical hacking

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime