Which approach helps avoid lost updates in concurrent write scenarios?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Attach a version to the aggregate. On update, compare the version; if it changed, reject and let the caller retry with fresh state. This keeps throughput high under low contention and surfaces conflicts when they matter.

Code Solution

SolutionRead Only

UPDATE orders SET ... WHERE id=? AND version=?;
-- if 0 rows affected -> conflict

Practice Sets

This question appears in the following practice sets:

Low-Level Design (LLD) Interview Core

Next Question

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime

Which approach helps avoid lost updates in concurrent write scenarios?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Which statement best describes the Single Responsibility Principle?

Open–Closed Principle encourages what practice when adding features?

High-Level Design (HLD) typically focuses on which artifacts?

Which UML diagram best captures interactions over time between components?

Which pairing describes a healthy design goal?

More from System Design

Master Interviews Anywhere, Anytime

Which approach helps avoid lost updates in concurrent write scenarios?

Problem Statement

Explanation

Code Solution

Practice Sets

Related Questions

Which statement best describes the Single Responsibility Principle?

Open–Closed Principle encourages what practice when adding features?

High-Level Design (HLD) typically focuses on which artifacts?

Which UML diagram best captures interactions over time between components?

Which pairing describes a healthy design goal?

More from System Design

Master Interviews
Anywhere, Anytime